القائمة الرئيسية

الصفحات

Hard Wager Security Council Resolution No. 2532 Written by / Enas Abdel Hadi Al-Rubaiy الرهان الصعب قرار مجلس الامن رقم (2532) بقلم ايناس عبد الهادي الربيعي معهد العلمين للدراسات العليا



Hard Wager Security Council Resolution No. 2532
Written by / Enas Abdel Hadi Al-Rubaiy
الرهان الصعب قرار مجلس الامن رقم (2532)
بقلم / ايناس عبد الهادي الربيعي
معهد العلمين للدراسات العليا



Hard Wager Security Council Resolution No. 2532                                   
 Written by / Enas Abdel Hadi Al-Rubaiy                                                      
الرهان الصعب قرار مجلس الامن رقم (2532)
بقلم / ايناس عبد الهادي الربيعي
معهد العلمين للدراسات العليا

Three months ago, calls were made for the adoption of the French-Tunisian draft resolution to adopt an immediate and comprehensive cessation of hostilities in all countries included in the Security Council’s agenda and to strengthen international cooperation in combating the pandemic due to the continuation of armed actions despite the outbreak of the Corona pandemic, so that it would be one of the means to deliver humanitarian aid to those most in need  To her in light of the spread of the epidemic, to demand the decision that all 15 council members voted in favor of the resolution even before the deadline for the vote scheduled for the first Wednesday of June, as the text of the decision focuses on supporting the invitation of the Secretary-General of the United Nations (Antonio Guterres) sent on the twenty-third of last March  A global cease-fire so that the world can focus on tackling the outbreak of the disease, for the Security Council to vote after months of fruitless negotiations on the resolution due to the conflict between the United States and China on the World Health Organization's signal to stop US President Donald Trump to stop US funding to the organization with its announcement last May  That the United States would withdraw from membership of the organization, the United States wanted to withdraw any reference to the organization from the decision while it came  China responded by mentioning the World Health Organization specifically to make the decision that passed on Wednesday a compromise, as it does not refer to the organization and does not talk about the transparency demanded by the United States, so that the decision is the first real behavior and procedure issued by the Council since the outbreak of the pandemic despite the lack of clarity as a result  The decision to end hostilities after the Secretary-General of the United Nations announced that the decision was supported by more than one hundred and eighty countries and more than twenty armed groups with his assertion that this was not accompanied by concrete measures, despite the fact that the decision was issued unanimously at an invitation that includes engaging in a humanitarian pause  He has been standing for at least ninety consecutive days to allow him to deliver humanitarian aid and conduct medical evacuations, but he reiterated that this does not apply to military operations against ISIS and al-Qaeda, but rather related to the conflicts in Syria, Yemen, Libya, southern Sudan, and the Congo, after criticizing the stalemate that he suffered  The Security Council during the past three months at a time coinciding with the global crisis, describing the relationship between the United States, Russia and China on the other side of the dysfunction and the  T made it virtually impossible for the Security Council to take any meaningful and effective decision to combat the Covid-19 virus. Despite the multiplicity of the parties, this has become an obstacle to cooperation mechanisms.                                                                                    
 By referring to the aforementioned Security Council resolution, we find that it is one of the international efforts towards a humanitarian catastrophe and an international ordeal that the contemporary world suffers from, and perhaps it is one of the most serious challenges that faced progress and development at the global level. In addition to its negative social, psychological and dangerous effects, it represents a brake on development and collective and economic security, which may be left behind.  Destructive, despite international efforts at the global level and the local level in the field of limiting the pandemic and preventing its spread and mitigating its impact on individuals and societies, there is still a lot to do at the international level within the scope of the United Nations and its organizations, especially the World Health Organization, the Labor Organization, UNICEF and the United Nations program.                                                                                                  
one Development and the High Commissioner for Human Rights and other related organizations, which confirms the need for an effective international and regional partnership especially that the pandemic suddenly befalled the international community reminiscent of the eighties of the last century when the world was surprised to discover a deadly disease that threatens the human community in all its categories, which is AIDS, which  Make international organizations and research centers come to study  Working to stop its spread, so the international community joined forces to contribute to dealing with this catastrophe, and despite these continuous efforts and decades ago, a cure vaccine has not been reached so far, which may show the weak focus of research studies to reach a cure vaccine and treatments that eliminate it, which brings us back to a pandemic.  Corona and the need to emphasize continuing efforts to find a cure vaccine in light of the reality and reality of the emergence of deadly diseases threatening humanity as a moral responsibility of the international community.                                  
 Returning to the Security Council resolution and its legal value, we find that the Charter of the United Nations has placed the Security Council in charge of international peace-keeping, and thus the Security Council’s decisions are unique in the binding force, not all other branches of the international body.  The international body must take in accordance with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations, and this condition stipulated in the text of Article 25 of the Charter differs from a precedent in Article 24. A specific decision issued by the Security Council may be in agreement with the goals and principles of the United Nations, yet it is contrary to the provisions of the Charter because of failure to observe the procedural rules.  Or the rules of jurisdiction when issued, as the matter must be related to decisions and not recommendations, especially with regard to settling international disputes, then the latter does not have a binding force for implementation, since the enjoyment of binding decisions by the Security Council is accompanied by the availability of two conditions, the first of which are decisions by their nature, the recommendations do not have their nature  By force of compulsion, the second was issued in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and is an important constraint placed on the authority of the Security Council in taking the decision  It is so that it does not exceed its terms of reference granted to it in accordance with the Charter.                                                                       
 And since the risk of a pandemic is likely to endanger international peace and security while hampering peacebuilding efforts for countries that have emerged from armed conflict to be a strong signal of unity within the Council, even though the decision was issued one hundred and eleven days after the date of the declaration of the World Health Organization (Covid-  19) As a global pandemic, to be a gesture of hope to the world for the Union to cross the crisis, especially after the Council called on the Secretary-General of the United Nations to give directions to the thirteen United Nations peacekeeping missions to support the efforts of host countries to contain the virus and provide updates on the efforts of the United Nations to address the pandemic in conflict areas and crisis areas  Humanity.                                                                                   
 On the other hand, we find that the issuance of the aforementioned resolution represents a victory for French-Tunisian diplomacy in obtaining the approval of the fifteen members of the Security Council, including the United States and China, to devote themselves to the dangers of the pandemic spread around the world after a delay of three months due to the American-Chinese disagreements over responsibility for spreading  The pandemic, for the resolution to set clear priorities for the Security Council to exercise its functions in accordance with the Charter while emphasizing the existence of a political will to overcome the divergence of views and give priority to                                                                     the interests of the international     community  and that the   Council must unite in the most difficult times, especially in light of the global struggle against the epidemic, so this decision is considered a victory for pluralism and granting conservation  Peace is a priority in the scope of international cooperation to combat the epidemic, after it was a station for international division without reaching an agreement, and a period of stalemate that lasted for three months related to an ineffectual debate .                                                                                            
هل اعجبك الموضوع :

تعليقات

التنقل السريع