Hard Wager Security Council
Resolution No. 2532
Written by / Enas Abdel Hadi
Al-Rubaiy
الرهان الصعب قرار مجلس الامن رقم (2532)
بقلم / ايناس عبد الهادي الربيعي
معهد العلمين للدراسات العليا
Hard Wager Security Council Resolution No.
2532
Written
by / Enas Abdel Hadi Al-Rubaiy
الرهان الصعب قرار مجلس الامن رقم (2532)
بقلم / ايناس عبد الهادي الربيعي
معهد العلمين للدراسات العليا
Three months ago,
calls were made for the adoption of the French-Tunisian draft resolution to
adopt an immediate and comprehensive cessation of hostilities in all countries
included in the Security Council’s agenda and to strengthen international
cooperation in combating the pandemic due to the continuation of armed actions
despite the outbreak of the Corona pandemic, so that it would be one of the
means to deliver humanitarian aid to those most in need To her in light of the spread of the epidemic,
to demand the decision that all 15 council members voted in favor of the
resolution even before the deadline for the vote scheduled for the first
Wednesday of June, as the text of the decision focuses on supporting the
invitation of the Secretary-General of the United Nations (Antonio Guterres)
sent on the twenty-third of last March A
global cease-fire so that the world can focus on tackling the outbreak of the
disease, for the Security Council to vote after months of fruitless
negotiations on the resolution due to the conflict between the United States
and China on the World Health Organization's signal to stop US President Donald
Trump to stop US funding to the organization with its announcement last
May That the United States would
withdraw from membership of the organization, the United States wanted to
withdraw any reference to the organization from the decision while it came China responded by mentioning the World
Health Organization specifically to make the decision that passed on Wednesday
a compromise, as it does not refer to the organization and does not talk about
the transparency demanded by the United States, so that the decision is the
first real behavior and procedure issued by the Council since the outbreak of
the pandemic despite the lack of clarity as a result The decision to end hostilities after the
Secretary-General of the United Nations announced that the decision was
supported by more than one hundred and eighty countries and more than twenty
armed groups with his assertion that this was not accompanied by concrete
measures, despite the fact that the decision was issued unanimously at an
invitation that includes engaging in a humanitarian pause He has been standing for at least ninety
consecutive days to allow him to deliver humanitarian aid and conduct medical
evacuations, but he reiterated that this does not apply to military operations
against ISIS and al-Qaeda, but rather related to the conflicts in Syria, Yemen,
Libya, southern Sudan, and the Congo, after criticizing the stalemate that he
suffered The Security Council during the
past three months at a time coinciding with the global crisis, describing the
relationship between the United States, Russia and China on the other side of
the dysfunction and the T made it
virtually impossible for the Security Council to take any meaningful and
effective decision to combat the Covid-19 virus. Despite the multiplicity of
the parties, this has become an obstacle to cooperation mechanisms.
By referring to the aforementioned Security
Council resolution, we find that it is one of the international efforts towards
a humanitarian catastrophe and an international ordeal that the contemporary
world suffers from, and perhaps it is one of the most serious challenges that
faced progress and development at the global level. In addition to its negative
social, psychological and dangerous effects, it represents a brake on
development and collective and economic security, which may be left
behind. Destructive, despite
international efforts at the global level and the local level in the field of
limiting the pandemic and preventing its spread and mitigating its impact on
individuals and societies, there is still a lot to do at the international
level within the scope of the United Nations and its organizations, especially
the World Health Organization, the Labor Organization, UNICEF and the United
Nations program.
one Development
and the High Commissioner for Human Rights and other related organizations,
which confirms the need for an effective international and regional partnership
especially that the pandemic suddenly befalled the international community
reminiscent of the eighties of the last century when the world was surprised to
discover a deadly disease that threatens the human community in all its
categories, which is AIDS, which Make
international organizations and research centers come to study Working to stop its spread, so the
international community joined forces to contribute to dealing with this
catastrophe, and despite these continuous efforts and decades ago, a cure vaccine
has not been reached so far, which may show the weak focus of research studies
to reach a cure vaccine and treatments that eliminate it, which brings us back
to a pandemic. Corona and the need to
emphasize continuing efforts to find a cure vaccine in light of the reality and
reality of the emergence of deadly diseases threatening humanity as a moral
responsibility of the international community.
Returning to the Security Council
resolution and its legal value, we find that the Charter of the United Nations
has placed the Security Council in charge of international peace-keeping, and
thus the Security Council’s decisions are unique in the binding force, not all
other branches of the international body.
The international body must take in accordance with the provisions of
the Charter of the United Nations, and this condition stipulated in the text of
Article 25 of the Charter differs from a precedent in Article 24. A specific
decision issued by the Security Council may be in agreement with the goals and
principles of the United Nations, yet it is contrary to the provisions of the
Charter because of failure to observe the procedural rules. Or the rules of jurisdiction when issued, as
the matter must be related to decisions and not recommendations, especially with
regard to settling international disputes, then the latter does not have a
binding force for implementation, since the enjoyment of binding decisions by
the Security Council is accompanied by the availability of two conditions, the
first of which are decisions by their nature, the recommendations do not have
their nature By force of compulsion, the
second was issued in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and is
an important constraint placed on the authority of the Security Council in taking
the decision It is so that it does not
exceed its terms of reference granted to it in accordance with the Charter.
And since the risk of a pandemic is likely
to endanger international peace and security while hampering peacebuilding
efforts for countries that have emerged from armed conflict to be a strong
signal of unity within the Council, even though the decision was issued one
hundred and eleven days after the date of the declaration of the World Health
Organization (Covid- 19) As a global
pandemic, to be a gesture of hope to the world for the Union to cross the
crisis, especially after the Council called on the Secretary-General of the
United Nations to give directions to the thirteen United Nations peacekeeping
missions to support the efforts of host countries to contain the virus and
provide updates on the efforts of the United Nations to address the pandemic in
conflict areas and crisis areas Humanity.
On the other hand, we find that the
issuance of the aforementioned resolution represents a victory for
French-Tunisian diplomacy in obtaining the approval of the fifteen members of
the Security Council, including the United States and China, to devote
themselves to the dangers of the pandemic spread around the world after a delay
of three months due to the American-Chinese disagreements over responsibility
for spreading The pandemic, for the resolution
to set clear priorities for the Security Council to exercise its functions in
accordance with the Charter while emphasizing the existence of a political will
to overcome the divergence of views and give priority to the
interests of the international community and that the
Council must unite in the most
difficult times, especially in light of the global struggle against the
epidemic, so this decision is considered a victory for pluralism and granting
conservation Peace is a priority in the
scope of international cooperation to combat the epidemic, after it was a
station for international division without reaching an agreement, and a period
of stalemate that lasted for three months related to an ineffectual debate
.
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق
اذا أعجبك الموضوع فلماذا تبخل علينا بالردود المشجعة